Skip to main content

Common Reasons of Manuscript Rejections

Nobody likes rejection. If you’ve spent a lot of your time and energy on your latest paper, only to possess it turned down, it’s getting to hurt. Articles get rejected for all manner of reasons, from easy to avoid errors and oversights, to easily falling outside of the journal’s scope. during this two-part blog post (part two to follow next week) we’ll check out a number of the foremost common reasons for rejection in additional detail, before discussing the varied options open to you if your article is rejected. So, what are the foremost likely reasons for rejection?
The manuscript fails the technical screening
Before the Manuscript gets passed to the Editor-in-Chief or Managing Editor of a journal, the editorial office will undertake some basic checks. The main reasons for rejection of papers at this stage include:
  • The paper contains elements that are suspected to be plagiarized
  • The paper is under review at another journal (submission to multiple journals at the same time isn’t allowed)
  • The manuscript lacks key elements such as a title, list of authors and affiliations, main text, references, or figures and tables
  • The quality of the language is not sufficient for review to take place
  • Tables and figures are not clear enough to read
  • The paper does not conform to the journal’s Author Guidelines
The manuscript does not fall within the journal’s Aims and Scope
If the paper won’t be of interest or value to the journal’s audience, it’s unlikely to be accepted. When choosing a journal to undergo , always confirm you read the Aims and Scope so you've got an understanding of the sort of articles the journal is looking for.
The research topic isn’t of great enough significance
Again, if the subject covered by the paper isn’t of interest to a journal’s audience, it'll likely be rejected. it's going to be that the paper’s findings are incremental and don't advance the sector , or that the manuscript is clearly a part of a bigger study which has been divided up to form as many articles as possible.
The research is over-ambitious
If the authors are overly ambitious or all-encompassing, results could also be difficult to interpret or may even be flawed. In these cases it's going to be more appropriate to divide the work into a series of smaller research projects.
A clear hypothesis hasn’t been established
The question behind the research could also be unclear, poorly formulated, or not relevant to the research field. completing an extensive literature review can help guide your hypothesis or research question.
The manuscript is incomplete
The paper might contain observations but isn't a full study, or it's going to ignore or overlook other important add the field.
There are flaws in the procedures, presentation or analysis of the data
Major flaws might include a scarcity of clear control groups or other comparison metrics, non-conformity with recognized procedures or methodology (which makes it difficult to repeat or replicate the work), or the shortage of a statistically valid analysis. be careful for any minor flaws like the wrong , inappropriate or unclear labeling of tables and figures.
Flaws in the manuscript’s arguments and/or conclusions
Arguments should be logical, structured and valid, and support the conclusions reached by the paper. If the conclusions reached can't be justified on the idea of the rest of the paper, or they ignore large portions of the literature, the manuscript are going to be rejected.
Language, writing and spelling issues
The language, structure of the paper, and any tables or figures got to be of excellent enough quality for the paper to be assessed; if this isn’t possible, then the paper are going to be rejected. It’s always an honest idea to ask others to see your paper before you submit it – a second pair of eyes can help pick up any errors you would possibly have missed. If you aren’t confident in your English writing skills, most publishers offer English language Editing services which you'll use before submitting your paper. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Solution Manual of A Primer in Game Theory by RA Gibbons

The Unofficial Solution Manual A  Primer In Game Theory by Robert Gibbons  Unofficial Solutions Manual To R.a Gibbon's A Primer In Game Theory Static Games of Complete Information 1.1 What is a game in normal form? What is a strictly dominated strategy in a normal-form game? What is a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in a normal-form game?  Answer 1.1 See text. 1.2 In the following normal-form game, what strategies survive  iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies? What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibra? Answer 1.2 B is strictly dominated by T. C is now strictly dominated  by R. The strategies (T,M) and (L,R) survive the iterated  elimination of strictly dominated strategies. The Nash Equilibrium  are (T,R) and (M,L). 1.3 Players 1 and 2 are bargaining over how to split one dollar. Both players simultaneously name shares they would like to have s1 and s2, where 0 < si, s2 < 1. If Si + s2 < 1, then...
Post a Comment
Read more

IMPLEMENTATION OF TRACE ANALYZER FOR NS3

IMPLEMENTATION OF TRACE ANALYZER FOR NS3 This chapter presents a framework for NS3 Trace Analyzer which is implemented in java. NS3 trace analyzer reads the .tr file and automatically calculates network performance parameters like throughput, packet delivery ratio, packet drop, packet sent, packet received. It makes post-processing of .tr file very easy. This NS3 Trace Analyzer was developed with the intention that the researchers can solely focus on design and development of new protocol than wasting much of his/her time in analyzing the .tr file. INTRODUCTION NS3 is an open source free software freely and publicly available for research and development. It is licensed under GNU GPLv2 license. The main aim of this NS3 project is to give network researchers the open simulation environment to test their network protocols so that these protocols give same performance in the real time screnario. NS3 is developed by Tom Henderson, George, Sally Floyd and Sumit Roy. The team receiv...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Analyze Research Paper for Researcher, Academic Students, doctrate, post doctral

There are two sections of a search paper counting on what style is being written. The sections are usually straightforward commentary of exactly what the author observed and located during the particular research. it's important to incorporate only the important findings, and avoid an excessive amount of information which will bury the precise meaning of the context. The results section should aim to narrate the findings without trying to interpret or evaluate, and also provide a direction to the discussion section of the research paper. The results are reported and divulges the analysis. The analysis section is where the author describes what was through with the info found. so as to write down the analysis section it's important to understand what the analysis consisted of, but doesn't mean data is ...
Post a Comment
Read more